Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051476›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2026

Five ways to get a grip on embedding Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility into survey design for non-equity related health professions education research topics.

Mujeedat Lekuti, Eleftheria Laios, Wiley Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mujeedat LekutiQueen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Eleftheria LaiosQueen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Wiley ChungQueen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health professions education research must integrate Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (EDIA) principles to ensure meaningful and impactful initiatives. Embedding these principles into research methods from the outset helps maintain the integrity of the research and ensures its outcomes align with EDIA values. Recognizing the limited guidance on incorporating EDIA principles into non-equity-related HPE survey methodology, we developed guidelines to address this gap. This led to the creation of 'Five Ways to Get a Grip on Embedding EDIA into Survey Design for non-equity related Health Professions Education Research,' which includes guidelines for integrating (1) diverse sources of knowledge, (2) usability, (3) context sensitivity, (4) bidirectionality, and (5) accessibility. Applying these guidelines can help make surveys inclusive and respondent-centered, providing a strong foundation for enhancing survey design and embedding EDIA principles within health professions education research.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsResearch DesignDiversity, Equity, InclusionHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforce Diversity

Identifiers

PMID42051476
PMCPMC13111179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.