ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Early clinical outcomes in emergency CABG in the United Kingdom.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is a paucity of evidence in the literature on trends, revascularisation techniques, and early clinical outcomes for patients undergoing emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Method: All patients who underwent first-time, emergency isolated CABG in the United Kingdom from 1996 to April 2019 were identified from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit database. Trend, early clinical outcomes, and revascularisation technique (on-pump and off-pump) were analysed. Results: A total of 8,221 patients were included; the median age was 67.9 years and 71% were male. The number of emergency CABG procedures fluctuated over the study period, ranging from approximately 350 cases per year in the early 2000s to around 525 in 2004. Since then, the number has declined, reaching approximately 325 procedures per year. Off-pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) was used in 12% of cases. The overall mortality was 10.9%, and the incidence of return to theatre was 9.4%. Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) occurred in 1.0% of patients, while stroke was observed in 1.7%. The incidence of postoperative dialysis was 8.5%, and deep sternal wound infection occurred in 1.0% of patients. After inverse probability treatment weighting (generating two balanced groups), OPCAB when compared with ONCAB was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality (8.7% vs. 11.2%, Conclusion: Emergency CABG remains a high-risk operation with significant in-hospital mortality. The use of OPCAB seems to be associated with lower in-hospital mortality and incidence of return to theatre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.