ArticleSurgery in practice and science2026
Plasma fibrinogen: A novel biomarker for preoperative prediction and quantification of peritoneal adhesions in emergency abdominal surgery.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Abdominal adhesions are the foremost complication following abdominal surgery, yet there is a noticeable lack of effective laboratory assessments that can be integrated with adhesion scoring systems to predict and quantify these adhesions. This study aims to explore the relationship between plasma fibrinogen (Fg) and abdominal adhesions, and to assess the feasibility of incorporating plasma Fg into a simplified Peritoneal Adhesion Index (PAI) score to predict and quantify these adhesions. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 231 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis who underwent surgery at The Third People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from July 2022 to August 2024. A comprehensive dataset including basic demographic information and laboratory results was compiled. Preoperative variables such as course of disease, plasma Fg, d-dimer, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, monocyte count, eosinophil count, basophil count, and lymphocyte countwere considered as independent variables. In the logistic regression analysis, the status of abdominal adhesion served as the dependent variable; in contrast, the simplified PAI score was the dependent variable in the multiple linear regression analysis. A cohort of 63 patients requiring emergency surgical intervention were prospectively enrolled for predictive modeling analysis between July 2022 and August 2024. Results: Logistic regression analysis identified plasma Fg as an independent predictor of abdominal adhesion status, while other parameters showed no significant correlations. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for diagnosing abdominal adhesion status using Fg was 0.856. The optimal cut-off value was identified as 3.205 g/L, with sensitivity and specificity values of 72.3% and 88.4%, respectively. The multiple linear regression analysis revealed significant associations of both course of disease (β=0.269, Conclusion: Plasma Fg significantly correlates with abdominal adhesion and serves as a reliable predictor of abdominal adhesion status in patients undergoing acute abdominal surgery prior to intervention. The simplified PAI score correlates with both Fg and course of disease. However, used in isolation, the predictive equation shows suboptimal performance, particularly exhibiting reduced accuracy in patients without adhesions. To enhance predictive accuracy, it is advisable to integrate the criterion of Fg levels below 3.205 g/L as indicative of the absence of adhesions into the predictive equation for assessing abdominal adhesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.