ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2026
The administration of proton pump inhibitors with the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib does not affect the clinical outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients.
Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib have rapidly become an established oral treatment for patients with ER+, HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The use of the oral route offers convenience and flexibility to the patient; however, the co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to mitigate gastrointestinal adverse events induced by anticancer treatments may decrease drug solubility, bioavailability, and potentially impact treatment efficacy. Objectives: The present study was aimed at investigating whether PPIs may affect the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with abemaciclib. Design: Multicenter observational cohort study on clinical data collected retrospectively. Methods: Patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative mBC candidates for a first-line treatment with abemaciclib as per clinical practice were enrolled. Patients were classified as "no concomitant PPIs" or "concomitant PPIs" if PPI administration covered not less than 2/3 of the treatment period with abemaciclib. All clinical interventions were made according to clinical practice. Results: One hundred eight patients were enrolled in this study; 66 belonged to the "no concomitant PPIs" group and 42 to the "concomitant PPIs" group. No statistically significant difference in PFS was found between the two groups ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the administration of PPIs to patients treated with abemaciclib is not associated with clinically significant drug-drug interactions on PFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.