ReviewPublic health challenges2026
Understanding Barriers to Cancer Pain Management: Insights From Patients and Healthcare Professionals-A Systematic Review.
Review in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The unheard pain: why patient-related barriers remain the weakest link in cancer pain management.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer-related pain is a prevalent and debilitating symptom that significantly impairs patients' quality of life, leading to physical discomfort as well as emotional and psychological distress. Despite the availability of effective pain control strategies, cancer pain remains inadequately managed worldwide. This challenge is multifactorial, involving barriers related to patients, healthcare providers, healthcare systems, and deficiencies in coordinated multidisciplinary care. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251027582). A comprehensive search of SCOPUS, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies examining barriers to cancer pain management from patient and healthcare professional perspectives were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and findings were synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 244 records were identified, with 23 studies meeting the inclusion criteria after screening and eligibility assessment. Overall methodological quality was good, although most studies were cross-sectional. Four major categories of barriers were identified: patient-related, healthcare provider-related, healthcare system-related, and multidisciplinary care-related barriers. Patient-related barriers were most frequently reported fear of opioid addiction, concerns about side effects, under-reporting of pain, fatalistic beliefs, and cultural or religious influences. Provider-related barriers involved inadequate training, poor pain assessment practices, opioid-related concerns, and limited inter-professional communication. System-level barriers included restrictive opioid regulations, limited access to analgesics, staffing shortages, and lack of standardized protocols. Multidisciplinary barriers reflected poor care coordination, insufficient patient education, and lack of individualized pain management plans. Conclusion: Cancer pain management is hindered by interconnected barriers across patient, provider, and system levels. Addressing these challenges requires improved clinical practices, targeted professional education, balanced opioid policies, and strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.