Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051381›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2026

Network Influence vs. Credibility in YouTube Sleep-Health Communication.

Atousa Ghahramani, Maria Prokofieva, Maximilian Pangratius de Courten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atousa GhahramaniInstitute for Sustainable Industries & Liveable Cities Business School Victoria University Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3362-9414
Maria ProkofievaInstitute for Sustainable Industries & Liveable Cities Business School Victoria University Melbourne Australia.
Maximilian Pangratius de CourtenInstitute for Health and Sport and Australian Health Policy Collaboration Victoria University Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9997-9359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insomnia is a prevalent sleep disorder that remains widely underdiagnosed and undertreated, prompting many individuals to seek health information beyond formal healthcare systems. Social media platforms, such as YouTube, have become influential spaces for the circulation of sleep-health information; however, concerns persist regarding whether credible, expert-led content achieves sufficient visibility to support population-level health outcomes. This study analyses 98 English-language YouTube videos to examine how sleep-health information circulates within an algorithmically mediated environment, focusing on the relationship between source credibility, network visibility, audience engagement and diffusion potential. Drawing on diffusion of innovations and social cognitive theory, the study conceptualises YouTube as a sociotechnical system in which opinion leadership, social reinforcement and algorithmic amplification jointly shape influence. The findings revealed a systematic credibility-influence gap, whereby visibility and diffusion are driven more by network position, engagement dynamics and algorithmic amplification than by source credibility. The results highlight a key public health challenge in which credible sleep-health information struggles to achieve reach within platform-mediated systems. By identifying the network and engagement mechanisms that shape diffusion, this study provided evidence to inform more effective digital health communication strategies aimed at increasing the visibility of trustworthy sleep-health information and supporting healthier lifestyles.

Indexed as

algorithmic visibilitycredibilitydigital healthhealth communicationnetworked influencesocial media platformsYouTube

Identifiers

PMID42051381
PMCPMC13116175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.