ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Case report: failed restoration of left ventricular function after myosplint® placement followed by successful HeartMate 3™ LVAD implantation.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mechanical restoration devices such as the Myosplint® were developed in the early 2000s to reshape left ventricular geometry and delay disease progression in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Despite initial safety and feasibility, long-term clinical efficacy remained limited. Today, patients with prior Myosplint® implantation may still present with end-stage heart failure requiring long-term mechanical circulatory support. However, device removal during HeartMate 3™ LVAD implantation may pose technical challenges due to altered myocardial anatomy. Case summary: We report the case of a 65-year-old male with combined dilated and ischaemic cardiomyopathy and severe mitral valve regurgitation who had received two Myosplint® devices and mitral valve annuloplasty in 2001. After progressive decline in cardiac function, HeartMate 3™ LVAD implantation was indicated. During surgery, the Myosplint® tendons were clearly visible through the apical coring site and were transected close to their insertion points without complication. The epicardial buttons were left Discussion: Our case highlights a safe and straightforward technique for Myosplint® tendon management during HeartMate 3™ LVAD implantation. It also supports a conservative approach to mitral valve intervention in select cases, suggesting that adequate LV unloading alone may suffice to reduce regurgitation. This experience provides guidance for surgeons managing patients with prior mechanical restoration devices undergoing LVAD implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.