ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Temporal Dynamic Machine Learning Prediction of Postoperative Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Duration in Esophageal Cancer: Integrating Preoperative and Perioperative Routine Blood Temporal Data and Dynamic Ultrasonic Features.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Gastrointestinal dysfunction following esophageal cancer surgery represents a prevalent postoperative complication. This study aims to develop a time-dynamic machine learning model to predict the duration of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGID) by integrating preoperative and perioperative continuous blood data with dynamic ultrasound characteristics, thereby facilitating early clinical intervention. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 826 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy between 2017 and 2024 was enrolled and stratified into a training set (70%), a validation set (15%), and a test set (15%). Predictive variables encompassed baseline demographic and clinical data, blood routine parameters at five distinct time points, and ultrasound features at three time points. Four machine learning models were constructed: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN), and Random Forest (RF). Model performance was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Coefficient of Determination (R Results: The LSTM model demonstrated superior predictive performance on the test set, achieving an MAE of 1.23 ± 0.31 days, an RMSE of 1.56 ± 0.42 days, an Conclusion: The time-dynamic LSTM model, which integrates continuous blood data, ultrasound features, and baseline characteristics, accurately predicts POGID duration and identifies actionable intervention targets. This model can be integrated into clinical decision support systems to optimize perioperative management and enhance postoperative recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.