ArticleJEM reports2026
Initiating buprenorphine in New Jersey emergency departments: a mixed methods study.
Article in JEM reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) represent a critical touchpoint in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), yet evidence-based practices such as buprenorphine initiation have not been widely adopted. Objectives: This study describes state-wide uptake of buprenorphine by Medicaid-enrolled patients with OUD who are seen in New Jersey (NJ) EDs and examines related clinical ED practices. Methods: This sequential mixed-methods study used NJ Medicaid claims and qualitative interviews with ED leaders. Quantitative analyses included NJ Medicaid enrollees aged 18-64 treated in NJ EDs for OUD-related diagnoses. The primary quantitative outcome was ED-associated buprenorphine utilization, defined as buprenorphine that was dispensed or filled 0-4 days after ED discharge. Results of the quantitative analyses were used to classify EDs as higher and lower prescribing, from which ED leaders were then purposively sampled to participate in semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed inductively. Results: Overall buprenorphine initiation peaked at 14.4 % in 2022 and there was wide variation across EDs. Interviewees commonly reported that peer navigator programs, availability of community-based providers, and a positive culture toward MOUD facilitated buprenorphine initiation. Conversely, provider hesitancy, limited community resources, and regulatory factors were reported as major barriers. Conclusions: While volumes of patients presenting to NJ EDs with OUD remain high, low rates of buprenorphine initiation and prescription persist. Providers and institutions possess great variation in their comfort with and ability to initiate buprenorphine in the ED and future work to standardize this evidence-based practice is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.