Trial reportJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2026
Virtual reality simulation with eye-tracking feedback versus mannequin-based training for situational awareness in trauma management under simulated emergency department interruptions in Iran: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eye-Tracking Analysis of Attention Disruptions Under Realistic Interruptions During Trauma Management; A Cross-sectional Study in a Simulated Virtual Reality.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo primarily examine the feasibility of implementing eye-tracking-based feedback within a virtual reality (VR) trauma simulation with realistically simulated emergency department interruptions, and to explore preliminary changes in situational awareness (SA) (primary outcome), Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) performance, and trauma-management errors (exploratory outcomes) compared with conventional mannequin-based simulation.
methodsIn this pilot randomized pretest-posttest study, 35 medical interns were assigned to VR training with eye-tracking heatmap feedback (n=17) or mannequin-based training with instructor verbal feedback (n=18). SA (modified Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique), ATLS checklist performance, and trauma-management error scores were measured before and after the intervention. Within-group changes were tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and between-group differences were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test on change scores (Δ=post-pre), with effect sizes reported as r.
resultsBaseline pretest performance did not differ significantly between the groups. Both groups improved in SA and ATLS performance (all P<0.001) and reduced error scores (VR: P=0.004; mannequin: P<0.001). In exploratory between-group comparisons, the VR group showed numerically greater improvements in SA (mean change 6.59 vs. 3.11; P=0.006, r=0.46), ATLS performance (22.12 vs. 8.22; P=0.003, r=0.48), and error reduction (-9.36 vs. -3.61; P=0.005, r=0.47). Given the pilot design, these differences should be interpreted as preliminary signals.
conclusionIn this pilot study, both training modalities were associated with improved SA and ATLS performance and with fewer errors, with point estimates favoring the VR condition. These preliminary signals suggest that VR with eye-tracking feedback may be a promising option for trauma training in interruption-rich, emergency department-like settings and warrants further evaluation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.