ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2026
Acceptability and Preferences of Long-Acting Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Antiretroviral Therapy Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and People Who Inject Drugs in India: Insights for Future Implementation.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLong-acting injectable (LAI) antiretroviral therapy (ART) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have significant potential to impact the HIV epidemic, but there is little data on the acceptability of these newer technologies among people who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM) in low-resource settings. We examined acceptability and preferences of LAI ART and PrEP among community-based samples of PWID and MSM in India.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of PWID and MSM in eight Indian cities (November 2022-May 2024) using respondent-driven sampling. Participants completed a survey including socio-demographics, substance use, risk behaviours, HIV testing/care history, acceptability of LAI ART and knowledge, acceptability, and preferences of different PrEP modalities (i.e. daily oral, monthly oral, LAI and implant). We assessed correlates of acceptability using Poisson regression models. To understand PrEP preferences, we used a modified Borda count method-a rank voting procedure.
resultsOverall, 2249 MSM and 4499 PWID (98% male) were recruited. Among those previously diagnosed with HIV, 89% (MSM) and 75% (PWID) reported a very good chance they would use LAI ART. MSM experiencing unstable housing and PWID virally suppressed were more willing to use LAI ART. Twenty percent and five percent of MSM and PWID, respectively, had ever heard of PrEP. Among those without an HIV diagnosis, 77% (MSM) and 62% (PWID) reported a very good chance they would use LAI PrEP. MSM with more sexual partners and sexually transmitted infection symptoms and PWID who had heard of PrEP were more willing to use LAI PrEP. Among MSM interested in PrEP, monthly oral pills were most preferred, followed by LAI, daily oral pills and then implant. Among PWID, monthly oral pills were most preferred, followed by daily oral pills, LAI and then implant.
conclusionsMSM and PWID in India were open and interested in LAI ART and PrEP. Once these become available, programmes with thoughtful community outreach and education, alongside flexible delivery models, will be critical to success. For PrEP, continued investment in the development of extended-duration oral formulations is warranted and valuable in order to provide a variety of HIV prevention choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.