ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2026
Scaling Up HIV Self-Testing in Africa: Insights From National Programmatic Data in Eight Countries.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HIV self-testing and the global diagnostic gap: Addressing a decade of missed opportunity.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEvidence from routine, national programme data on HIV self-testing (HIVST) scale-up is limited. This study examines HIVST scale-up in eight African countries, describing how HIVST has been integrated into testing strategies and how testing coverage, test positivity, and linkage to antiretroviral therapy (ART) have evolved.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of national programme data from January 2019 to December 2023 across Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda and Zimbabwe. Data were disaggregated by quarter and subnational district. Indicators included HIVST kits distributed, conventional testing volumes, new HIV diagnoses and new ART initiations. We derived testing rates, testing positivity, ART linkage, and stability of HIVST distribution by district and over time.
resultsHIVST scale-up varied across countries. By the most recent quarter, HIVST accounted for 63% of total testing in Lesotho, 19%-25% in Malawi and Zimbabwe, but <15% in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and South Africa. In Malawi, Lesotho and Zimbabwe, large volumes of HIVST partially offset declines in conventional testing during the COVID-19 pandemic. HIVST remained modest (<15% of total tests) in Kenya and Tanzania. In Mozambique, both conventional testing and HIVST expanded. In South Africa, conventional testing remained high after COVID-19, while HIVST expanded slowly. Despite divergent trajectories, new HIV diagnoses and ART initiations remained stable in most settings, indicating programmes adapted to maintain case-finding even as testing volumes shifted.
conclusionsThis descriptive analysis shows HIVST has been scaled to different degrees, with its contribution to overall testing shaped by national contexts, and distribution models. Interpretation is constrained by incomplete reporting, the inability to identify kits used out of kits distributed and distinguishing first-time from repeat testers. These findings can guide optimizing HIV testing services, an essential step towards meeting global HIV targets and ending AIDS by 2030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.