SynthesisBioMed research international2026
Biofeedback Modalities Targeting Kyphosis and Lordosis: A Critical Appraisal Topic.
Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biofeedback Modalities Targeting Kyphosis and Lordosis: A Critical Appraisal Topic.BioMed research international · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostural deviations such as thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis are prevalent consequences of sedentary behavior, contributing to pain and disability. We aim to review the evidence on biofeedback modalities as active, user-engaged alternatives to passive correction targeting kyphosis and lordosis posture.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore (inception: September 2025) identified studies on adult populations. Primary outcomes were spinal alignment measures; secondary outcomes included muscle activity, pain, usability, and satisfaction. The results of the included studies were synthesized in a qualitative narrative way.
resultsFourteen studies involving 288 participants met inclusion criteria. Most studies used accelerometers or IMUs for posture detection. The most frequently applied modality was vibration feedback (n = 6), followed by auditory (n = 3), visual (n = 3), and multimodal systems (n = 2). Across studies, short-term improvements were consistent: reduced kyphotic (up to 8°) and lordotic (up to 10°) angles, decreased pain, and improved trunk posture (p < 0.05); enhanced awareness and spinal muscle relaxation (p < 0.05); and actuator-based systems achieved up to 25° of active correction but lacked long-term data. Modalities showed usability and user satisfaction and had postural measurement error of 1°-4° across studies.
conclusionBiofeedback modalities-particularly vibration and auditory systems-demonstrate measurable improvements in spinal alignment and engagement. Evidence is limited by low methodological rigor, small sample sizes, and short-term focus. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of biofeedback in longitudinal, real-world trials, with multimodal feedback and ergonomic integration for sustained postural correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.