Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051027›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Variable Selection in Mixed-Effects Location-Scale and Location-Shift Models.

Moritz Berger, Maria Iannario

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moritz BergerCore Facility Biostatistics, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0656-5286
Maria IannarioDepartment of Political Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2646-9937

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BE7543/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When ordinal responses to questionnaires structured on the basis of Likert scales show differing variability or heterogeneity in subgroups of the population, appropriate regression approaches that are able to take this issue into account are the location-scale and location-shift model. If data come in clusters, which causes within-cluster variance, an additional cluster-level random effect specification is due. Cumulative models for ordinal responses are considered assessing the responses in terms of mean level (or location), variability (or scale), heterogeneity (or dispersion) and in terms of random effects related to clusters. Furthermore, in order to reduce the complexity of the models, a variable selection procedure through adaptive fused LASSO-type regularization is proposed. A case study with data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe is used to demonstrate the applicability of the models and the properties of the selection procedures. It is shown that variable selection by regularization produces stable parameter estimates and results that are easy to interpret in all model components. The performance of the proposed regularization approach is further assessed by means of a simulation study.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationEuropeHumansRegression AnalysisSurveys and Questionnairesclustered dataLASSOlocation‐scale modellocation‐shift modelproportional odds modelvariable selectionvariance heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID42051027
PMCPMC13125975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.