ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
Age friendly states as a linchpin of age friendly ecosystems.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
States across the United States are advancing the age-friendly movement by joining networks that promote age-friendly communities. Although much of the existing scholarship has focused on local initiatives, far less attention has been paid to the role of states in sustaining and scaling age-friendly change. Age-Friendly States build on local momentum to drive systems-level changes that create healthier, more inclusive environments for older adults. This forum examines the role of states in shaping sustainable aging policy and practice. An environmental scan of age-friendly state plans and multisector plans on aging was conducted to document and examine how states design and implement approaches to healthy aging and to identify promising strategies for systems change across public sectors. Nineteen states met the inclusion criteria: 12 had AARP Age-Friendly State designations, eight had Multisector Plans for Aging in development or implementation, and four had Multisector Plans for Aging supported by legislation or executive orders. Findings from this analysis were synthesized to surface transferable models, enabling conditions, and actionable lessons that can inform future state and local efforts to embed age-friendly principles across systems to support long-term, equitable change. The authors argue that states involvement is a crucial lynchpin in advancing age-friendly ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.