ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Real-World Outcomes of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Melanoma as Third Line and Beyond.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-World Outcomes of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Melanoma as Third Line and Beyond.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab has demonstrated activity after anti-PD-1 failure in advanced melanoma, but its effectiveness in later lines and as rechallenge remains unclear. We aimed to characterize outcomes of nivolumab/ipilimumab administered in the third line or beyond. Using the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED), we identified patients with metastatic melanoma (excluding uveal melanoma) treated with nivolumab/ipilimumab after at least two prior lines of therapy, including adjuvant treatment, between 2017 and 2024. Baseline characteristics, prior treatments, and clinical outcomes were collected. Seventy-three patients were included (median age 57.8 years), of whom 47.9% had brain metastases. Most had progressed on anti-PD-1-based therapy (93.2%); 32.9% had prior exposure to anti-CTLA-4, and 84.9% had received BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Nivolumab/ipilimumab was administered as third-line therapy in 71.2%. After a median follow-up of 27.6 months, the overall response rate was 23.3% (12.5% with prior anti-CTLA-4 exposure vs. 28.6% without). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-NR). Median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.4-5.7) and median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI, 6.5-20.1). In conclusion, in heavily pretreated melanoma, nivolumab/ipilimumab induces durable responses in a minority of patients, with reduced efficacy after prior anti-CTLA-4 exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.