Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42050807›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Real-World Outcomes of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Melanoma as Third Line and Beyond.

Yago Garitaonaindia, Søren Kjær Petersen, Louise M Guldbrandt, Troels H Borch, Christina H Ruhlmann, Rasmus Blechingberg Friis, Adam A Luczak, Lars Bastholt, Henrik Schmidt, Inge Marie Svane and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yago GaritaonaindiaNational Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7816-3294
Søren Kjær PetersenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Louise M GuldbrandtDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Troels H BorchNational Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Christina H RuhlmannDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Rasmus Blechingberg FriisDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Adam A LuczakDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lars BastholtDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Henrik SchmidtDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Inge Marie SvaneNational Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Eva EllebaekNational Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6748-9232
Marco DoniaNational Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-9752

Funding

Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab has demonstrated activity after anti-PD-1 failure in advanced melanoma, but its effectiveness in later lines and as rechallenge remains unclear. We aimed to characterize outcomes of nivolumab/ipilimumab administered in the third line or beyond. Using the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED), we identified patients with metastatic melanoma (excluding uveal melanoma) treated with nivolumab/ipilimumab after at least two prior lines of therapy, including adjuvant treatment, between 2017 and 2024. Baseline characteristics, prior treatments, and clinical outcomes were collected. Seventy-three patients were included (median age 57.8 years), of whom 47.9% had brain metastases. Most had progressed on anti-PD-1-based therapy (93.2%); 32.9% had prior exposure to anti-CTLA-4, and 84.9% had received BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Nivolumab/ipilimumab was administered as third-line therapy in 71.2%. After a median follow-up of 27.6 months, the overall response rate was 23.3% (12.5% with prior anti-CTLA-4 exposure vs. 28.6% without). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-NR). Median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.4-5.7) and median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI, 6.5-20.1). In conclusion, in heavily pretreated melanoma, nivolumab/ipilimumab induces durable responses in a minority of patients, with reduced efficacy after prior anti-CTLA-4 exposure.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsIpilimumabMelanomaNivolumabAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeIpilimumabNivolumabimmunotherapymelanomanivolumab/ipilimumabreal world data

Identifiers

PMID42050807
PMCPMC13432422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.