Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42050788›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Spectral deep learning-based patient and bowtie scatter correction for clinical photon-counting CT.

Lukas Hennemann, Julien Erath, Andreas Heinkele, Eric Fournié, Martin Petersilka, Karl Stierstorfer, Marc Kachelrieß

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lukas HennemannDivision of X-ray Imaging and CT, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Julien ErathComputed Tomography Division, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany.
Andreas HeinkeleDivision of X-ray Imaging and CT, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Eric FourniéComputed Tomography Division, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany.
Martin PetersilkaComputed Tomography Division, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany.
Karl StierstorferComputed Tomography Division, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany.
Marc KachelrießDivision of X-ray Imaging and CT, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of scatter in computed tomography degrades image quality, and can be caused by the patient and by other components in the beam path, such as the bowtie filter. While conventional energy-integrating detectors do not provide spectral distinction, photon-counting (PC) detectors are energy-selective and provide spectral information about the incoming X-ray photons. Since each energy threshold is affected differently by scatter, this spectral information implicitly encodes the scatter content of a projection. PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to investigate how the spectral information can be exploited to improve deep learning (DL)-based scatter correction. Furthermore, the performance of joint and separate patient and bowtie scatter correction will be investigated, addressing that bowtie scatter has not been considered in current DL-based approaches.

methodsWe present a DL-based approach that can estimate bowtie and patient scatter jointly and compare it against a separate correction. We also introduce neural network-based methods that incorporate the spectral information inherent in PCCT for scatter correction. We present networks that estimate scatter for up to four energy thresholds simultaneously. Training and validation was performed with Monte Carlo data as well as with real data measured by a clinical PCCT system.

resultsWhen comparing joint and separate patient and bowtie scatter estimation, both methods reduce the mean absolute error (MAE) from 8 HU to 1 HU. All proposed DSE methods effectively reduce scatter artifacts and perform better than the convolution-based reference approach. Incorporating the spectral information further improves the performance, with the DSE variant with four energy thresholds achieving the best overall results for all thresholds. For all energy thresholds tested, the spectral DSE methods reduced scatter errors originating from the patient and the bowtie in PCCT from up to 8 HU to below 1 HU. In addition to the global MAE, we report a critical MAE (MAE

conclusionsThis paper presents a combined method for correcting patient and bowtie scatter that delivers results equivalent to separate corrections and thus eliminates the need for multiple networks. Further, we demonstrate that deep scatter estimation can effectively exploit the spectral information available to improve scatter correction, especially for spectral applications, like VMIs. Spectral DSE networks slightly outperformed non-spectral variants, with multiple energy thresholds lead to more accurate estimations. This enables the use of one network for scatter correction and eliminates the need for multiple ones, thereby saving computational cost and complexity.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhotonsScattering, RadiationTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansMonte Carlo Methodbowtiephoton‐counting CTscatter correction

Identifiers

PMID42050788
PMCPMC13125421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.