ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
From Low Field to High Value: Robust Cortical Mapping From Low-Field MRI.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional reconstruction of cortical surfaces from MRI for subsequent morphometric analysis is fundamental for understanding brain structure. While high-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging (HF-MRI) is the standard in research and clinical settings, its relatively limited availability hinders widespread use. Low-field MRI (LF-MRI), particularly portable systems, offers a cost-effective and accessible alternative. However, existing cortical surface analysis tools, such as FreeSurfer, are optimized for high-resolution HF-MRI and struggle with the lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and resolution of LF-MRI. In this work, we present a machine learning method for 3D reconstruction and analysis of portable LF-MRI scans over a range of contrasts and resolutions. Our method works "out of the box" and does not require retraining. It leverages a 3D U-Net trained on synthetic LF-MRI data to predict signed distance functions of the cortical surfaces, followed by geometric processing to ensure topologically accurate reconstructions. We evaluate our approach using paired HF-/LF-MRI scans of the same 15 subjects and 50 subjects from the ULF-EnC dataset. The results show that our method robustly recovers surfaces across LF-MRI acquisitions, with accuracy depending on MRI contrast mechanism (T1 vs. T2), slice anisotropy (axial vs. isotropic), and resolution. A 3 mm isotropic T2-weighted scan acquired in under 4 min, which is comparable in duration to typical HF-MRI acquisitions, yields strong agreement with HF-derived surfaces: surface area correlates at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.