ArticleBMC psychology2026
Investigating the interplay between social exclusion and meaning in life: the catalytic influence of psychological flexibility and basic psychological needs.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough prior studies have demonstrated that social exclusion adversely influences individuals’ sense of meaning in life, the underlying mediating mechanisms and moderating boundaries have not been fully examined. Accordingly, the present study investigated whether basic psychological needs mediate the relationship between social exclusion and meaning in life, and whether this mediating pathway is moderated by psychological flexibility.
methodsA three-wave, time-lagged quantitative design was employed with a sample of 1,056 Chinese college students. Participants completed validated questionnaires assessing social exclusion, meaning in life, basic psychological needs, and psychological flexibility.
resultsSocial exclusion was negatively associated with meaning in life, and basic psychological needs served as a significant mediator in this relationship (indirect effect = − 0.21). Psychological flexibility significantly moderated the association between social exclusion and basic psychological needs (interaction effect = 0.11, p < 0.01), and also moderated the mediating effect of basic psychological needs on meaning in life.
conclusionFindings indicate that social exclusion may erode college students’ sense of life purpose by undermining the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. This underscores the importance of providing adequate social resources and opportunities to meet diverse student needs and foster interpersonal support. Moreover, targeted psychological training should be prioritized for students exhibiting low psychological flexibility. Implementing evidence-based interventions to enhance adaptability and positive cognitive reappraisal may help students accept challenging circumstances, shift toward constructive thinking patterns, and strengthen their sense of meaning in life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.