ArticlePorcine health management2026
Retrospective pig welfare assessment at rendering plants - a useful tool for monitoring and inspection.
Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 98/58/EC (1) states that animal owners and care takers must ensure that animals under their care are not subjected to unnecessary pain, suffering and injury. Until now, rendering plants as a potential ‘exit’ in animal production have been largely ignored as a potential assessment site for animal welfare monitoring. The aim of the present work was to provide an overview of welfare-related lesions commonly found in pigs at rendering plants. Data collection was carried out in Austrian and German rendering plants and focussed on lesions that were expected to be recognizable for any pig farmer.
resultsIn the Austrian study, 20.8% of all pigs delivered to a rendering plant showed lesions potentially associated with substantial pain and/or suffering. In Germany, 16.0% of examined pigs (sample A) may have been exposed to substantial pain and/or suffering. Most common lesions were biting wounds, ulcerative skin lesions and swellings.
conclusionsBased on the results it must be assumed that a considerable number of pigs experienced substantial pain and/or suffering prior to death. External examinations focusing on potentially welfare-relevant lesions carried out at rendering plants could be helpful in identifying farms at high risk of non-compliance with the Animal Welfare Act.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.