ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2026
The Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Skull Soft Tissues: Implications for Bone Conduction Coupling.
Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveQuantify mastoid soft-tissue thickness on temporal bone computed tomography (CT) and evaluate associations with body mass index (BMI), age, and sex. STUDY
designRetrospective cross-sectional study.
settingTertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Adults with temporal bone CT and a recorded BMI within 12 months.
main outcome measuresMean mastoid soft-tissue thickness measured at 6 sites (3 per ear) on multiplanar reconstructions.
resultsOne hundred forty-seven CT scans (mean age: 57.4±22.0 y; 46.3% male; mean BMI: 30.2±9.9 kg/m 2 ). The mean mastoid thickness was 9.7±4.1 mm (range: 3.4 to 27.0 mm). BMI was associated with greater mastoid thickness (adjusted β =0.30 mm per kg/m 2 , 95% CI: 0.25-0.34; P <0.001). Male sex was associated with thicker tissue (adjusted difference: 1.37 mm, 95% CI: 0.46-2.27; P =0.003), whereas age was not independently associated. Interaural means were highly correlated ( r =0.89), with a negligible paired difference. Interrater ICC for mean mastoid thickness was 0.995 (n=59).
conclusionsMastoid soft-tissue thickness varies widely and increases predictably with BMI. BMI may serve as an accessible clinical proxy for the soft-tissue envelope at bone conduction coupling sites, with potential implications for the interpretation of bone conduction audiometry and the planning of skin-drive and magnet-retained bone conduction hearing devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.