ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026
Feasibility and perceived impact of a clinician-led bimanual training program using joystick-operated ride-on toys incorporated into an intensive task-oriented hybrid summer camp for children with unilateral cerebral palsy.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (UCP) have significant limitations in upper extremity (UE) function impacting their independence and quality of life. Our study objectives were to assess (a) the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating a novel, bimanual ride-on-toy navigation (RNT) training program within a 3-week intensive, hybrid UE training camp (modified constraint induced movement therapy + bimanual training) and (b) the combined benefits of the comprehensive camp training model as perceived by clinicians. METHODOLOGY: We employed a single-group, pretest-posttest design. Ten children with UCP (M(SD): 6.99(2.13) years) and 6 clinicians/camp staff were recruited through convenience sampling from an annually held intensive therapy camp for children with UCP. In the 3-week camp, children practiced goal-oriented and task-focused activities for 6 h/day (5 h of UE practice with a constraint on the less-affected arm and 1-h of bimanual practice without the constraint). Following an initial training session, camp staff delivered fourteen RNT sessions (~ 20 min/session) per child over the 3 weeks as part of the bimanual portion of the camp. Feasibility and acceptability of the RNT program were assessed by monitoring adherence, through child and camp staff exit questionnaires, the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, and video-based behavioral coding. Clinician-perceived benefits of the overall camp programming, inclusive of RNT, was assessed using an exit questionnaire administered with camp staff and the ABILHAND-Kids Questionnaire. Given the pilot nature of this study and the small sample size, we report descriptive data, effect sizes, and 95% confidence intervals around the effect sizes.
resultsAll 10 participants completed the study (Adherence: Mean(SD): 90.7% (13.5%)). Staff were able to successfully deliver RNT with minimal issues and wanted to repeat it in subsequent camp iterations. Children found RNT enjoyable and were highly engaged across sessions. In combination with other camp programming, RNT led to clinician-perceived improvements in children's bimanual function and spontaneous affected UE use during daily activities.
conclusionsOur work suggests that RNT is an engaging, versatile, and easy-to-implement therapy adjunct that clinicians may use to incentivize affected UE use and motor practice in children with UCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.