SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
What do we know about flares in spinal and pelvic girdle pain? A scoping review.
Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFlares in spinal and pelvic girdle pain, such as low back pain, can substantially impact quality of life; however, the understanding of definitions, assessment approaches, and associated factors remains limited. This scoping review mapped the literature on flare definitions, measurement tools, and reported risk factors in adults with spinal and pelvic girdle pain.
methodsWe systematically searched five major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL) to identify studies reporting on flares in spinal and pelvic girdle pain. Key data were extracted and synthesized thematically to map the current evidence and identify gaps.
resultsAmong the 9,880 articles screened, 16 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, all focusing exclusively on low back pain. Although definitions of flares had shifted from pain-centered models to multidimensional frameworks incorporating functional and emotional impacts, consensus on specific domains remains lacking. Assessment tools, which primarily included numerical rating scales and single-item self-reports, were identified, but none had psychometric validation. Physical activity, sleep, and psychological factors were identified risk factors for flares; however, the available evidence was limited and inconsistent, with most studies having a high risk of bias and focusing on a narrow range of factors.
conclusionsThis review highlights significant gaps in the understanding and assessment of flares in spinal and pelvic girdle pain. Future research should focus on establishing a consensus on flare domains, developing validated assessment tools, and conducting rigorous studies to identify a broader range of risk factors across spinal and pelvic girdle pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.