SynthesisBMC public health2026
Navigating healthcare, managing life, or falling through the cracks? A theory-informed systematic review of the chronic burden faced by women with recurrent urinary tract infections.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRecurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are often treated as discrete biomedical episodes, yet women experience them as chronic, disruptive, and stigmatized conditions. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on women’s lived experiences of rUTIs, situating and evaluating findings against frameworks of chronic illness and gender.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched seven databases for studies on adult women with rUTIs (≥ 2 in 6 months OR ≥ 3 in 12 months) across healthcare navigation, emotional wellbeing, work, and family/relationships, published January 2015-March 2025. Only peer-reviewed empirical studies in English were included. Study quality was appraised using QuADS framework.
resultsFrom 3,628 records screened, fifteen studies were included. Women reported fragmented care, repeated antibiotic use with limited preventive guidance, and mistrust of providers. Emotional burdens such as anxiety and stigma were common, often linked to hygiene or sexuality. rUTIs disrupted intimacy, family planning, and work, though these domains were rarely examined in depth. While findings showed relevance to chronic illness and gender frameworks, few studies engaged these perspectives explicitly, leaving results descriptive rather than analytic. Quality appraisal showed frequent gaps in stakeholder involvement, sampling documentation, and methodology justification.
conclusionsWhile rUTIs create chronic and gendered burdens extending beyond clinical symptoms, research has yet to fully draw on theoretical frameworks to capture women’s lived experiences. Moving forward, research and policy should look beyond biomedical framings and adopt theory-informed, intersectional, and patient-centered approaches that address not only episodic challenges but also long-term difficulties, structural barriers, and equity in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.