Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42050544›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2026

Transformative justice approaches to domestic, family, and sexual violence: a scoping review.

Jade Lane, Amy Kirwan, Nina Storey, Georgina Sutherland, Mark Stoove

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jade LaneBurnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. jade.lane@burnet.edu.au.ORCID 0009-0001-6347-0697
Amy KirwanBurnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Nina StoreyFlat Out, Melbourne, Australia.
Georgina SutherlandMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark StooveBurnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.

Funding

Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestic, family, and sexual violence (DFSV) is a widespread public health and human rights issue that disproportionately affects structurally marginalised communities. Mainstream justice responses-focused on policing, criminalisation, and incarceration-frequently do not meet the needs of victim-survivors. Transformative justice (TJ) offers community-led, non-carceral responses that promote harm reduction by seeking to reduce the harms of criminalisation, prevent further violence, promote healing and accountability, and transform the structural conditions that lead to violence. This scoping review maps the characteristics and applications of TJ in the context of DFSV.

methodsLed by victim-survivors of DFSV, this review followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2005 and 2025 was sourced from eight databases and Google. Sources were included if they described the characteristics of TJ in non-carceral contexts. Sixty-one sources met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a customised tool and synthesised thematically.

resultsMost included sources originated in the United States and were situated outside academic publishing, reflecting TJ's community-based origins. TJ was consistently defined as an abolitionist approach rooted in community accountability, survivor autonomy, and structural transformation. Core principles included anticarceral and feminist commitments, trauma-informed care, and relational accountability. Goals focused on building safety within communities, creating justice processes not reliant on punitive measures, and transforming systemic conditions. Practices included pod mapping, transformative education, and knowledge-building activities such as storytelling and creative expression. The literature highlighted tensions around scalability, consistency, and engagement with state systems.

conclusionsTJ is an evolving field that remains resistant to formal institutionalisation and centres the leadership of those most affected by violence and criminalisation. Its relevance to harm reduction lies in its focus on preventing violence and criminalisation while building community prevention capacities. Research, policy, and practice should prioritise investment in grassroots infrastructures and the leadership of victim-survivors and marginalised communities. The reviewed literature argues that applications of TJ resist being reduced to static models or assimilated into carceral frameworks. Rather, their potential is founded on collective support and sustained political organising, and the long-term work of community transformation. REGISTRATION: This review followed a pre-specified protocol developed by the research team in accordance with JBI methodology (Peters M et al. in E. Aromataris (eds) Joanna Briggs Institute: South Australia, 2015) and PRISMA-ScR guidelines (Tricco AC et al. in Ann Intern Med 169:467-673, 2018). The protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (2025) doi: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FTSR4 .

Indexed as

Domestic ViolenceHarm ReductionSex OffensesSocial JusticeCrime VictimsHumansCommunity accountabilityDomestic violenceEpistemologyHarm reductionJBI methodologyLived experienceScoping reviewTransformative justice

Identifiers

PMID42050544
PMCPMC13262466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.