ArticleBMC health services research2026
Cultivating rural surgical leaders through a structured training program: a qualitative case study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, 5 billion individuals lack access to safe surgical care, with rural regions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) disproportionately affected. In Pakistan, rural areas face critical surgical workforce shortages (6 specialists/100,000 people) and infrastructural deficits, compounded by financial barriers. The Rural Surgical Leadership Program (RSLP) was designed to train general surgeons in multidisciplinary procedural and leadership skills to address these gaps. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and perceived impact of a context-adapted surgical leadership program designed to meet rural health system needs in Pakistan.
methodsThis embedded qualitative single case study evaluated the RSLP through semi-structured interviews (n = 5: 3 graduates, 2 supervisors) conducted via telephone (September-October 2024). Transcripts were thematically analyzed with inductive coding, supported by reflexivity and peer debriefing to ensure rigor.
resultsThree themes emerged: (1) Rural facilities faced systemic challenges, including geographic isolation, absent surgical staff, and inadequate equipment (2). RSLP graduates gained proficiency in obstetrics and trauma care but reported gaps in orthopedics and radiology (3). Graduates demonstrated leadership, reducing urban referrals by 50-60%, mentoring staff, and optimizing workflows. Supervisors noted their impact exceeded clinical care, including community outreach and affordability initiatives. The RSLP highlights the transformative potential of context-adapted surgical training in LMICs. Graduates' ability to reduce referrals and revitalize rural services aligns with global models. Persistent gaps in orthopedics and radiology underscore the need for integrated simulation tools (e.g., low-cost phantoms) and telehealth for continuous mentorship. Policy recommendations include extending specialty rotations, formalizing telemedicine partnerships, and aligning curricula with WHO surgical indicators. By merging technical and leadership training, the RSLP provides a replicable framework to strengthen rural surgical systems. Sustained investment in such programs is critical to advancing equitable access to essential surgery and achieving universal health coverage in underserved regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.