ArticleBMC surgery2026
Preoperative distal radius CT hounsfield unit and other imaging predictors of postoperative radiocarpal traumatic arthritis after distal radius fracture.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostoperative radiocarpal traumatic arthritis (TA) after distal radius fracture (DRF) may cause persistent pain and functional impairment. Early risk stratification may help identify patients at increased risk. This study aims to identify independent predictors of radiocarpal TA after DRF and develop multifactorial predictive models.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 226 DRF patients grouped by radiocarpal TA status. Variables were screened using univariate and correlation analyses. Logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) models were developed using a 70/30 stratified train–test split (seed = 42); 10-fold stratified cross-validation was performed within the training set, and final performance was evaluated on the test set.
resultsIndependent predictors included preoperative step-off > 2 mm (OR = 6.12, 95% CI: 1.79–20.94), radial shortening > 3 mm (OR = 8.02, 95% CI: 2.55–25.21), low distal radius CT Hounsfield Unit (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99–1.00). The LR model achieved an AUC of 90.71%, and the SVM model an AUC of 91.34%.
conclusionBoth LR and SVM models showed promising internal performance for predicting radiocarpal TA after DRF. These findings may support preoperative risk stratification, but external validation is required before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.