ArticleBMC medical education2026
Knowledge, trust attitudes, and behaviors towards AI and their association with critical thinking disposition in Chinese undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical education offers potential learning benefits but also raises concerns about its potential impact on critical thinking (CT) development. This study aims to examine the associations between medical undergraduates’ AI usage (frequency and duration), perceived trust attitudes towards AI, AI knowledge, responsible usage behaviors (verification and ethical considerations), and their CT disposition.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at a Chinese medical school. Participants completed the Chinese version of Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI-CV) and a structured questionnaire assessing AI usage, knowledge, perceived trust attitudes, responsible usage behaviors, and other related variables. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression to identify predictors of CT disposition.
resultsThe mean CTDI-CV score was 292.19 (SD = 39.25), with 60.6% of participants showing a positive CT disposition. AI usage frequency and duration had no significant associations with CT disposition. Significant differences in CTDI-CV scores were found across majors (t = 5.244, p < 0.001), grade levels (F = 13.574, p < 0.001) and academic performance (F = 5.354, p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression revealed that responsible usage behavior was a significant positive predictor of CT disposition (Beta = 0.140, p < 0.05), whereas higher perceived trust attitude towards AI was a negative predictor (Beta = -0.129, p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe findings indicate that responsible usage behavior toward AI is positively associated with CT disposition, while perceived trust attitudes toward AI emerge as a negative predictor. These results suggest that medical education should place greater emphasis on cultivating critical engagement and verification skills rather than focusing solely on technical AI proficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.