ArticleBMC medical education2026
Artificial intelligence in dentistry: knowledge, attitudes, and educational readiness among dental students and dentists.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the perceived Artificial Intelligence Literacy Questionnaire-6 (PAILQ-6) in Arabic-speaking pharmacists: A cross-sectional methodological study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- AI In Dental Education: Upskilled, Differently Skilled, or Never Skilled?European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
- Responsible Clinical AI in Dentistry: Trust, Professional Autonomy, and Perceptions of Accountability Across Stakeholders in Romania-A Multidisciplinary Cross-Sectional Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring Senior Dental Students' Readiness and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApplications of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine and dentistry have been increasing in recent years. Understanding the educational readiness, learning needs, and perceptions of AI among dental students and professionals is essential for curriculum development. This study aimed to evaluate the level of knowledge, sources of information, attitudes, and educational preparedness regarding AI among dental students’ and dentists.
methodsA cross-sectional, anonymous online survey was conducted among 501 participants (332 females, 169 males), including undergraduate dental students, postgraduate/doctoral students, and practicing dentists. The 28-item questionnaire assessed demographics, AI knowledge, attitudes toward AI, and views on AI education. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data; Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, and chi-square tests were applied for group comparisons, while binary logistic regression and Spearman correlation analyses were used to examine predictors and associations related to AI learning and curriculum support.
resultsMore than half of the participants (53.7%) reported only superficial knowledge of AI, while 4.8% reported no knowledge. Formal university-based education was the primary source of AI information for only 3% of respondents, whereas social media constituted the main source for 64.7%. Despite limited structured educational exposure, attitudes toward AI were predominantly positive. Over 70% of participants agreed that AI should be included as an educational component supporting diagnostic reasoning and learning processes, while agreement with statements suggesting that AI would replace dentists within the next 30 years was low. Significant differences in AI perceptions were observed according to age and gender (p ≤ 0.001), whereas professional experience showed limited influence on overall attitudes. Willingness to learn and apply AI-based systems was moderately correlated with perceived clinical benefit (ρ = 0.524, p < 0.001) and the perceived need to integrate AI into dental education (ρ = 0.553, p < 0.001).
conclusionsDespite limited formal education, dental professionals view AI as a supportive tool rather than a replacement. Given that social media was the primary source of AI information while formal university-based education was minimal, these findings highlight a clear need for structured curricular integration. These findings necessitate the integration of AI literacy into both university curricula and lifelong learning frameworks to ensure professional continuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.