Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42050517›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Artificial intelligence in dentistry: knowledge, attitudes, and educational readiness among dental students and dentists.

Ali Altındağ, Sultan Uzun, Ömer Altındağ, Kaan Orhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI In Dental Education: Upskilled, Differently Skilled, or Never Skilled?European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali AltındağFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Meram Province, 42090, Türkiye. alialtindag1412@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-5193
Sultan UzunFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-055X
Ömer AltındağFaculty of Science, Department of Statistics and Computer Sciences, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7035-9612
Kaan OrhanFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-0176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApplications of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine and dentistry have been increasing in recent years. Understanding the educational readiness, learning needs, and perceptions of AI among dental students and professionals is essential for curriculum development. This study aimed to evaluate the level of knowledge, sources of information, attitudes, and educational preparedness regarding AI among dental students’ and dentists.

methodsA cross-sectional, anonymous online survey was conducted among 501 participants (332 females, 169 males), including undergraduate dental students, postgraduate/doctoral students, and practicing dentists. The 28-item questionnaire assessed demographics, AI knowledge, attitudes toward AI, and views on AI education. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data; Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, and chi-square tests were applied for group comparisons, while binary logistic regression and Spearman correlation analyses were used to examine predictors and associations related to AI learning and curriculum support.

resultsMore than half of the participants (53.7%) reported only superficial knowledge of AI, while 4.8% reported no knowledge. Formal university-based education was the primary source of AI information for only 3% of respondents, whereas social media constituted the main source for 64.7%. Despite limited structured educational exposure, attitudes toward AI were predominantly positive. Over 70% of participants agreed that AI should be included as an educational component supporting diagnostic reasoning and learning processes, while agreement with statements suggesting that AI would replace dentists within the next 30 years was low. Significant differences in AI perceptions were observed according to age and gender (p ≤ 0.001), whereas professional experience showed limited influence on overall attitudes. Willingness to learn and apply AI-based systems was moderately correlated with perceived clinical benefit (ρ = 0.524, p < 0.001) and the perceived need to integrate AI into dental education (ρ = 0.553, p < 0.001).

conclusionsDespite limited formal education, dental professionals view AI as a supportive tool rather than a replacement. Given that social media was the primary source of AI information while formal university-based education was minimal, these findings highlight a clear need for structured curricular integration. These findings necessitate the integration of AI literacy into both university curricula and lifelong learning frameworks to ensure professional continuity.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitude of Health PersonnelDentistsEducation, DentalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeStudents, DentalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAI literacyAttitudesAwarenessDentistryTechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID42050517
PMCPMC13267726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.