SynthesisBMC endocrine disorders2026
The role of resistance training in improving beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC endocrine disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBeta-cell function is a critical parameter for diagnosing and managing Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Progressive β-cell failure is a key driver of disease progression and long-term complications in T2DM. While aerobic exercise has been shown to improve glycemic control, the specific effect of resistance training (RT) on β-cell function remains less explored. The aim of this review is to investigate whether RT improves β-cell function in people living with prediabetes or T2DM compared to control conditions, and to estimate the magnitude of this effect.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six controlled trials involving a total of 581 participants were included. The sample consisted of adults with prediabetes or T2DM participating in structured RT programs. Measures of β-cell function, including HOMA-β, HOMA2-β, and the disposition index (DI), were assessed. Fasting-based indices were pooled using random-effects models where sufficient data were available, and remaining studies were synthesized narratively. The Cochrane RoB 2 tool and ROBINS-I were used to assess the risk of bias, and the GRADE framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence.
resultsMeta-analysis of three RCTs showed that resistance training produced significant improvements in fasting β-cell function indices compared with non-exercise or control conditions (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.19-0.91, p = 0.002). Included interventions ranged from 8 to 52 weeks, with moderate-to-high intensity protocols (60-80% 1-RM). Narrative synthesis of all six trials indicated favorable changes in fasting glucose and HbA1c, though not all comparisons reached statistical significance. Overall heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 34.6%).
conclusionsThe findings suggest that resistance training may enhance β-cell performance and cardiometabolic markers in adults with prediabetes or T2DM, with moderate-certainty evidence from RCTs. These results support the inclusion of RT in routine exercise prescriptions for diabetes management. However, the limited number of available trials and reliance on fasting-based indices highlight the need for larger, well-controlled studies using dynamic measures of β-cell function. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251137273 . CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.