ArticleBMC public health2026
The relationship between environmental literacy and global warming knowledge levels in faculty of health sciences students.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study was conducted to examine the relationship between environmental literacy and global warming knowledge levels among future healthcare professionals who will play a role in protecting and promoting public health.
methodsThe study was conducted using a comparative and correlational design to examine the relationship between environmental literacy and global warming knowledge levels among students in the Faculty of Health Sciences at a foundation university. Data were collected from 258 students between April 5 and June 4, 2024, through an online survey in accordance with the principles of personal data protection and confidentiality. The Student Information Form, the Environmental Literacy Scale for Adults (ELSA), and the Global Warming Knowledge Scale (GWKS) were used for data collection. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's correlation analysis. The results were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval and a significance level of p < 0.05.
resultsIt was determined that the students scored 83.42 ± 11.10 on the ELSA and 107.68 ± 15.03 on the GWKS, and that these scores were above the average level. The environmental awareness levels of students who reported having received education on the environment and global warming were found to be significantly higher. It was also found that students who were members of environmental organizations/clubs/similar institutions and who were willing to engage in voluntary work had higher levels of environmental concern, awareness, and environmental literacy. In addition, a positive correlation was found between global warming knowledge and environmental literacy (r = 0.34).
conclusionsThe results of the study indicate that environmental literacy is significantly associated with students' levels of knowledge about global warming. It is recommended to integrate courses on environmental literacy into the curriculum to increase the knowledge levels of future healthcare professionals regarding global warming. REPORTING
methodSTROBE checklist. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.