ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Enhancing drought stress mitigation in faba bean through natural biostimulants derived from banana and prickly pear peels.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of biostimulants in agriculture has shown fabulous potential in combating climate change induced stresses such as drought. Improving agricultural productivity requires sustainable drought stress management. This study investigates the potential of Musa paradisiaca L. (banana) and Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. (prickly pear) peels as natural biostimulants to alleviate drought stress in Vicia faba L. (faba bean). A greenhouse experiment was conducted using peel powder treatments (5 g/pot) under different field capacity levels to evaluate germination parameters, plant biomass and water content. Leaf ultrastructure and stress-related gene expression were also evaluated. In addition, the physicochemical characterization of peel powders, including soluble protein, soluble sugars, total phenolics and flavonoids, was performed.
resultsThe physicochemical characterization of banana and prickly pear peel powders revealed the presence of considerable amounts of phenolics, flavonoids, sugars, and proteins, with higher phenolic and flavonoid contents detected in Musa paradisiaca peel powder. The application of both peel extracts, particularly Musa paradisiaca L., significantly improved shoot and root length, plant biomass, and water content compared to untreated control plants. Under representative drought stress, most growth parameters and water content of the studied plants were higher in Musa paradisiaca L.-treated plants compared to their respective control, whereas Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. treatment showed comparatively lower values. TEM observations revealed improved leaf ultrastructure in treated plants under drought conditions. While qRT-PCR analysis indicated upregulation of stress-related genes. The transcript level of ascorbate peroxidase was significantly higher in plant treated with Musa paradisiaca L. than in plant treated with Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. when exposed to moderate drought (40%FC), suggesting a potential involvement of APX in antioxidant-related stress responses under drought conditions.
conclusionThese results suggest that natural peel powders could be a viable strategy for promoting sustainable agriculture and improving plant performance under drought. Overall, modulation of stress-related gene expression may contribute to improved drought responses in faba bean. These effects appear to be associated with improved water status, preservation of cellular ultrastructure, and regulation of stress-responsive pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.