ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026
Propellant-free intrawound antibiotic foam for intraoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrawound vancomycin powder is the most widely used intraoperative prophylactic intervention against surgical site infections (SSIs). However, applying raw drug powder to irregular or small surgical cavities can result in uneven wound coverage, drug precipitation, and airborne drug particles. To address these issues, we developed a surfactant-based aqueous foam specifically for spine surgery, where deep incisions and instrumentation heighten SSI risks. A rat model of spinal implant-associated Staphylococcus aureus infection was developed to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of intrawound vancomycin foam. The compatibility of the blank foam and the antimicrobial efficacy of the vancomycin foam were assessed in vivo in Sprague Dawley rats. Biocompatibility was evaluated by applying the foam, dispensed from a propellant-free pump device to the dorsal spine wound bed. The antimicrobial efficacy of the vancomycin foam was evaluated through exposure of the dorsal spine of the animals, foreign body implantation and S. aureus inoculation, with comparisons made to vancomycin powder-treated and untreated groups. Using a propellant-free pump device delivers the foam easily, ensuring uniform coverage and drug retention without leaving any solid residues. The foam formulation significantly increases vancomycin solubility compared to water alone. In a rat model of spinal implant-associated Staphylococcus aureus infection, the vancomycin foam demonstrated antimicrobial efficacy comparable to the vancomycin powder, with no observed soft tissue damage or systemic toxicity. Here, we have demonstrated that propellant-free aqueous foams can be an effective and simple alternative to intrawound vancomycin powder for preventing SSIs in spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42050315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.