ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026
Computational insights into drug hygroscopicity by coupling machine learning and molecular simulation.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hygroscopicity is one of the critical material attributes (CMAs) of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), and excessive hygroscopicity can adversely affect drug manufacturability, stability, and even therapeutic efficacy. Traditional experimental methods for measuring hygroscopicity are time- and resource-consuming, limiting their suitability for the growing demands of preformulation developability screening. Therefore, developing robust, high-throughput computational approaches to identify highly hygroscopic compounds is of great significance for drug screening, formulation design, and risk management. Here, we propose an integrated computational strategy that combines machine learning (ML) and molecular simulations for rapid prediction of drug hygroscopicity and mechanistic elucidation. A dataset comprising dynamic vapor sorption (DVS) curves for 607 drugs was first curated, based on which 8 ML algorithms representing different modeling principles were compared. Among them, Tabular Prior-data Fitted Networks (TabPFN) achieved the best performance, with an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
42050314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.