ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Impact of an Anticoagulation Management Service-Led Annual Review on Antiplatelet Use and Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prophylaxis in Ambulatory Patients on Background Direct Oral Anticoagulants.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients on long-term anticoagulation face increased bleeding risk when antiplatelets are co-prescribed, especially upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Guidelines recommend limiting antiplatelet use to highly select patients on background anticoagulants and promoting GI prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for those requiring dual antithrombotic therapy. To assess the impact of an anticoagulation management service (AMS)-led intervention on reducing excess antiplatelet use and increasing PPI prescribing in patients who require continued antiplatelet therapy. This study of retrospective chart review included adults (≥ 18 years) on long-term direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy from October 2023 to September 2024. The intervention group included AMS-enrolled patients who received structured annual anticoagulation review. The control group consisted of DOAC patients receiving usual care outside AMS. The AMS annual review aims to optimize antithrombotic therapy by deprescribing unnecessary antiplatelets and initiating PPIs when clinically indicated. Of 8,462 eligible patients, 3,125 were in the AMS group and 5,337 in the non-AMS group. Antiplatelet use was significantly lower in AMS patients at baseline (9% vs. 15%) and study end (7% vs. 16%) (p < 0.0001). PPI use was significantly higher in AMS patients at both time points (50% vs. 30% for baseline, 67% vs. 38% at the end of study) (p < 0.0001). Acceptance rates for AMS recommendations were 18.8% for antiplatelet discontinuation and 33% for PPI initiation. AMS-led interventions effectively reduced concurrent antiplatelet use in patients on background DOAC and increased PPI prescribing in those on dual therapy, demonstrating the value of centralized anticoagulation services in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.