ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Cell Therapy and Graft Engineering for Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is one of the most serious long-term complications of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), substantially impairing quality of life and increasing non-relapse mortality. This narrative review summarises current evidence on cellular therapies for cGVHD, focusing on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), with emphasis on graft source differences, GVHD prevention and immune reconstitution, cell source, manufacturing, dosing, concomitant immunosuppression, and endpoint definition, alongside emerging approaches such as NK/iNKT-cell strategies and engineered Tregs. Bone marrow transplantation is used as the primary reference platform, with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and non-bone marrow-derived cell products included as contextual evidence where appropriate. Overall, Treg- and MSC-based therapies show promise for prevention and treatment; MSCs have the broadest clinical experience, whereas Treg-based approaches offer a more specific tolerance-restoring rationale. A key limitation is the inability to fully address tissue fibrosis. Treatment responses remain variable, durability is limited, and safety profiles require further optimisation. Clinical efficacy remains inconsistent, with a gap between mechanistic promise and clinically interpretable evidence. Future progress will depend on clearer clinical positioning, standardised cell products, prospective evaluation of steroid-sparing outcomes, GVHD-free or failure-free survival, patient-reported outcomes, and biomarker-guided immune monitoring. Thus, we propose practical recommendations for stratification and endpoint standardisation to enhance the clinical utility of cell therapy in chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.