Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42050228›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Perceived severity and parental distress after positive expanded newborn screening: parent-clinician concordance and dyadic processes.

Marco Bani, Selena Russo, Serena Gasperini, Viola Crescitelli, Francesca Menni, Francesca Furlan, Francesco Tagliaferri, Graziella Cefalo, Sabrina Paci, Giuseppe Banderali and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marco BaniSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy. marco.bani1@unimib.it.
Selena RussoSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Serena GasperiniDepartment of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Viola CrescitelliDepartment of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Francesca MenniRegional Clinical Center for Expanded Newborn Screening, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Francesca FurlanRegional Clinical Center for Expanded Newborn Screening, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Francesco TagliaferriRegional Clinical Center for Expanded Newborn Screening, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Graziella CefaloDepartment of Woman and Child, Pediatric Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Sabrina PaciDepartment of Woman and Child, Pediatric Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe BanderaliDepartment of Woman and Child, Pediatric Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Paola MarchisioRegional Clinical Center for Expanded Newborn Screening, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Adriana BalduzziSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Maria Grazia StrepparavaSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receiving a positive expanded newborn screening result is highly stressful for parents. This study aimed to examine parent-clinician concordance in perceived severity, to investigate its association with parental emotional distress at baseline and six months after communication, and to explore the interdependence between perceived severity and perceived control within parental dyads. A total of. 171 mothers and 168 fathers reported parental distress and completed the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Emotion Thermometers. Perceived severity and control were measured using single-item Likert scales reflecting subjective appraisals at the time of disclosure. For 147 parents (74 mothers and 73 fathers), a clinician-rated severity score was available. An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model with indistinguishable dyads was applied to 115 parental couples. Most parents (61.9%) rated their child's condition as more severe than the clinician. At baseline, higher parental severity ratings relative to clinicians were associated with higher distress and post-traumatic symptoms. No differences were observed at 6 months. Higher perceived severity in one parent was associated with lower perceived control in the partner (β = - 0.207, p = .004).

conclusionDifferences between parental and clinician perceptions of severity are common following positive ENBS communication and are associated with elevated early parental distress. Psychosocial support may benefit from adopting a dyadic perspective, acknowledging that each parent's appraisal of the situation can shape the partner's adjustment. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Receiving communication of positivity at the ENBS can be highly stressful for parents. • Parents' perceptions of disease severity play an important role in their psychological adjustment. WHAT IS NEW: • Parent-clinician misalignment in perceived severity is frequent after positive ENBS communication and is associated with higher early parental distress. • Parental perceptions of severity and control show significant dyadic interdependence within couples, high lighting parental adjustment as a relational process.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningParentsProfessional-Family RelationsPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleSeverity of Illness IndexCommunication of positivityConcordanceExpanded newborn screeningMetabolic diseasesParental distressSeverity

Identifiers

PMID42050228
PMCPMC13124833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.