ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Perceived severity and parental distress after positive expanded newborn screening: parent-clinician concordance and dyadic processes.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardioneuromodulation for Recurrent Malignant Neurocardiogenic Syncope in Pediatric Patients: Results from a Tertiary Center.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Receiving a positive expanded newborn screening result is highly stressful for parents. This study aimed to examine parent-clinician concordance in perceived severity, to investigate its association with parental emotional distress at baseline and six months after communication, and to explore the interdependence between perceived severity and perceived control within parental dyads. A total of. 171 mothers and 168 fathers reported parental distress and completed the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Emotion Thermometers. Perceived severity and control were measured using single-item Likert scales reflecting subjective appraisals at the time of disclosure. For 147 parents (74 mothers and 73 fathers), a clinician-rated severity score was available. An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model with indistinguishable dyads was applied to 115 parental couples. Most parents (61.9%) rated their child's condition as more severe than the clinician. At baseline, higher parental severity ratings relative to clinicians were associated with higher distress and post-traumatic symptoms. No differences were observed at 6 months. Higher perceived severity in one parent was associated with lower perceived control in the partner (β = - 0.207, p = .004).
conclusionDifferences between parental and clinician perceptions of severity are common following positive ENBS communication and are associated with elevated early parental distress. Psychosocial support may benefit from adopting a dyadic perspective, acknowledging that each parent's appraisal of the situation can shape the partner's adjustment. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Receiving communication of positivity at the ENBS can be highly stressful for parents. • Parents' perceptions of disease severity play an important role in their psychological adjustment. WHAT IS NEW: • Parent-clinician misalignment in perceived severity is frequent after positive ENBS communication and is associated with higher early parental distress. • Parental perceptions of severity and control show significant dyadic interdependence within couples, high lighting parental adjustment as a relational process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.