Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42050184›Full record

ReviewPlanta2026

Can biological control involving predatory mites mitigate plant stress caused by phytophagous mites?

Wesley Borges Wurlitzer, Julia Renata Schneider, Mateusz Labudda, Julia Huppes Majolo, Marcelo Lattarulo Campos, Joaquim A G Silveira, Daniel Guimarães Silva Paulo, Maria Goreti de Almeida Oliveira, Noeli Juarez Ferla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wesley Borges Wurlitzer *Laboratory of Acarology, Tecnovates, Universidade do Vale do Taquari, Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. wesleeywurlitzer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3749-2355
Julia Renata Schneider *Laboratory of Acarology, Tecnovates, Universidade do Vale do Taquari, Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.
Mateusz LabuddaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw, University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Julia Huppes MajoloLaboratory of Acarology, Tecnovates, Universidade do Vale do Taquari, Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.
Marcelo Lattarulo CamposIntegrative Plant Research Laboratory, Departamento de Botânica e Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, UFMT, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Joaquim A G SilveiraPlant Metabolism Laboratory (LabPlant), Universidade Federal do Ceara, UFC, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Daniel Guimarães Silva PauloBIOAGRO‑Instituto de Biotecnologia Aplicada à Agropecuária /INCT‑Interações Planta‑Praga, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, UFV, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maria Goreti de Almeida OliveiraBIOAGRO‑Instituto de Biotecnologia Aplicada à Agropecuária /INCT‑Interações Planta‑Praga, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, UFV, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Noeli Juarez FerlaLaboratory of Acarology, Tecnovates, Universidade do Vale do Taquari, Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 310146/2023-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe biological control of phytophagous mites mediated by predatory mites promotes the maintenance of plant physiology by mitigating damage and preserving key traits related to photosynthesis and development. The immune system of plants, upon perceiving the presence of phytophagous mites, triggers signals mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Under intense infestations, these redox signals can trigger oxidative stress, which compromises vital characteristics related to plant fitness. The use of pesticides as a management strategy is increasingly limited by resistance and collateral physiological impacts on plants. The release of predatory mites has emerged as an effective and sustainable biological approach. Predator-mediated foraging may suppress phytophagous mite infestations and mitigate the physiological stress of plants by limiting metabolic expenditures and physiological disturbances related to photosynthesis, growth, and reproduction. Thus, we review the benefits and risks of signals mediated by ROS in plants under attack by phytophagous mites. We conceptualize a stress state for plants under attack by these organisms and describe the benefits of foraging predatory mites reported in the literature from a meta-analytical perspective. Based on existing studies, we show that these natural enemies mitigate damage and the intensification of foliar chlorosis, limiting impacts on leaf area, the number of leaves, and the size of the plants. Furthermore, we speculate how the intensity of stress in the plant could act as a key point in the signals emitted to attract predatory mites. Finally, we emphasize the urgency of integrating this new perspective into future studies to improve the evaluation of the efficiency of natural enemies to benefit plant performance.

Indexed as

MitesPest Control, BiologicalPlantsStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsPredatory BehaviorReactive Oxygen SpeciesReactive Oxygen SpeciesHerbivoryOxidative stressPest managementPlant physiologyPlant stressStress mitigation

Identifiers

PMID42050184
PMCPMC13124832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.