ReviewPlanta2026
Can biological control involving predatory mites mitigate plant stress caused by phytophagous mites?
Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of temperature on the development and reproduction of Macrocheles nataliae.Experimental & applied acarology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThe biological control of phytophagous mites mediated by predatory mites promotes the maintenance of plant physiology by mitigating damage and preserving key traits related to photosynthesis and development. The immune system of plants, upon perceiving the presence of phytophagous mites, triggers signals mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Under intense infestations, these redox signals can trigger oxidative stress, which compromises vital characteristics related to plant fitness. The use of pesticides as a management strategy is increasingly limited by resistance and collateral physiological impacts on plants. The release of predatory mites has emerged as an effective and sustainable biological approach. Predator-mediated foraging may suppress phytophagous mite infestations and mitigate the physiological stress of plants by limiting metabolic expenditures and physiological disturbances related to photosynthesis, growth, and reproduction. Thus, we review the benefits and risks of signals mediated by ROS in plants under attack by phytophagous mites. We conceptualize a stress state for plants under attack by these organisms and describe the benefits of foraging predatory mites reported in the literature from a meta-analytical perspective. Based on existing studies, we show that these natural enemies mitigate damage and the intensification of foliar chlorosis, limiting impacts on leaf area, the number of leaves, and the size of the plants. Furthermore, we speculate how the intensity of stress in the plant could act as a key point in the signals emitted to attract predatory mites. Finally, we emphasize the urgency of integrating this new perspective into future studies to improve the evaluation of the efficiency of natural enemies to benefit plant performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.