Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42050149›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Impact of heart rate on Doppler echocardiography predictors of rhythm control in patients with septic shock.

Tomas Tencer, Michal Maly, Eva Svobodova, Michal Otahal, Ivana Jurisinova, Pavel Trachta, Adela Krajcova, Frantisek Duska, Petr Waldauf, Martin Balik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tomas TencerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Michal MalyDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 12808, Prague, Czechia.
Eva SvobodovaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 12808, Prague, Czechia.
Michal OtahalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 12808, Prague, Czechia.
Ivana JurisinovaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 12808, Prague, Czechia.
Pavel TrachtaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 12808, Prague, Czechia.
Adela KrajcovaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Frantisek DuskaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Petr WaldaufDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Martin BalikDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 12808, Prague, Czechia. martin.balik@vfn.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-2143

Funding

Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky NV18-06-00417General University Hospital in Prague MH CZ-DRO 0064165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doppler parameters used to predict the maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) may be influenced by heart rate. We included patients with septic shock who developed SVA, had normal to moderately reduced left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction > 35%), and received continuous noradrenaline at doses < 1.0 µg/kg/min. Cardioversion was successful in 96% of the 209 patients with the echocardiographic data available for 187 patients post cardioversion. The mitral E wave velocity decreased from 87 (76;100) cm/s during SVA to 82 (70;98) cm/s at 4 h (p = 0.001), while the newly restored mitral A wave increased from 65 (52;79) cm/s at 1 h to 69 (56;83) cm/s at 4 h (p = 0.002). Similarly, the A wave velocity-time integral (Avti) increased from 7.00 (5.63;8.28) cm to 7.65 (6.10;9.40) cm, p < 0.001. A weak positive relationship between the heart rate (85 (77;95) bpm) and A wave (R

Indexed as

Echocardiography, DopplerHeart RateShock, SepticAgedElectric CountershockFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrineStroke VolumeNorepinephrineAtrial fibrillationA wave velocity–time-integralCardioversionRhythm controlSeptic shockTrans-mitral a wave

Identifiers

PMID42050149
PMCPMC13315611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.