ArticleScientific reports2026
Ensemble machine learning framework with SHAP and LIME for accurate early prediction of student success in online learning environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of digital learning environments has generated rich educational data capable of supporting early prediction of student outcomes. In this study, seven diverse datasets, spanning demographics, parental education, assessment history, and VLE engagement, were integrated into a unified machine-learning pipeline. Four supervised algorithms (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Multi-Layer Perceptron) were trained using SMOTE and stratified fivefold cross-validation. XGBoost demonstrates the strongest performance among the evaluated models, achieving 95.04% accuracy, ROC-AUC of 0.9879, F1-score of 0.95, precision of 0.96, and recall of 0.95 on the test set. Cross-validation further confirmed the model's robustness (mean ROC-AUC = 0.9879). The Bagging ensemble also demonstrated competitive performance, achieving a cross-validation accuracy of 0.9487, a cross-validation F1-score of 0.9470, and a test accuracy of 0.9504. To ensure interpretability, SHAP and LIME were employed, revealing cumulative assessment performance, withdrawal patterns, and engagement intensity as the most influential predictors. The results demonstrate that combining strong predictive algorithms with explainable AI (XA) creates a reliable early-warning system capable of supporting targeted academic interventions and improving institutional decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.