ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Deep learning-based automatic scoring of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polysomnography is the standard tool for assessing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity; however, it does not provide information regarding the anatomical site or extent of upper airway obstruction. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) serves as a dynamic method to evaluate airway collapse under sleep-like conditions, thereby helping to bridge this gap. However, its clinical utility is limited by inter-observer variability and subjectivity in interpretation. We developed internally and externally validated deep learning models utilizing convolutional neural networks based on EfficientNet-B2 and Attention Multiple Instance Learning to predict the degree of airway obstruction (DISE-V-obs, DISE-OTE-obs) and the primary cause of obstruction (DISE-OTE-cause) using DISE videos from 1904 patients across five Korean hospitals. The F1 scores for DISE-V-obs, DISE-OTE-obs, and DISE-OTE-cause were 84.7%, 74.7%, and 88.2%, respectively. These objective predictions of obstruction degree and primary cause may enhance clinical decision-making and treatment planning for patients with OSA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.