ArticleNeuroinformatics2026
Unveiling an ALS Blood Transcriptomic Signature: A Machine Learning Classifier Distinct from Neurodegenerative Controls.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The absence of accessible and reliable biomarkers constitutes a critical barrier for the early diagnosis and stratification of neurodegenerative diseases. While peripheral blood offers a minimally invasive window into systemic pathophysiology, identifying molecular signatures that survive biological heterogeneity and technical noise remains an unresolved challenge. In this study, this issue was addressed through a comparative systemic transcriptomic analysis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and Parkinson’s disease (PD) in whole blood, implementing a comprehensive workflow integrating unsupervised network analysis and supervised machine-learning methods. By employing LASSO regression and cross-validation across independent external cohorts, a stable and specific transcriptomic signature for ALS was identified, comprising key crosstalk genes involved in systemic immune dysregulation and microglial function, including CTSS, PTEN, IL18, PTPRC, and CSF1R. In contrast, AD and PD exhibited weak transcriptomic signatures with poor predictive reproducibility, suggesting a distinctive systemic pathology in ALS. In addition, the study confirms the superiority of linear modeling for this genomic signature: while complex non-linear algorithms, specifically Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest, displayed high initial performance, they collapsed due to overfitting during external validation. Conversely, the linear LASSO model demonstrated superior robustness and generalizability (AUC 0.74). In conclusion, this study not only defines a unique systemic immunotranscriptomic signature for ALS, distinguishable from other neurodegenerative pathologies, but also establishes interpretability and linear simplicity as essential factors for developing reproducible blood-based biomarkers with clinical translational potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.