Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049984›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2026

Bourdieu's capitals matter: tracking longer working lives across Europe.

Martin Lakomý, Filip Majetić, Muradiye Ateş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin LakomýFaculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czechia. martinlakomy@seznam.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4625-4463
Filip MajetićInstitute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar, Zagreb, Croatia.
Muradiye AteşDepartment of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology CA21107Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy CZ.02.01.01/00/23_025/0008743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extending working lives is a major European policy goal, but the role of individual resources in retirement timing remains underexplored. To our knowledge, this study is the first to apply Bourdieu's theory of capitals as a framework for understanding how resources/capitals affect retirement decisions over time. Using Waves 6-9 of panel data from Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, the study employs exploratory factor analysis to identify forms of capital and multilevel, time‑lagged logistic regression (observations nested within individuals) to explore how various forms of capital help older workers (N = 12,816) to remain in employment across three successive periods. The results show that human and health capital (dimensions of broader cultural capital) indeed help older adults to extend their working lives. The impact of other forms of capital (economic capital and dimensions of social capital) diminishes once relevant control variables are included, and the findings are robust across different time spans. Moreover, separate models by welfare regime capture substantial cross‑European variation, with some capitals predicting retirement only in certain welfare regimes. Overall, Bourdieu's framework proves relevant in the current situation of population ageing and the digitalisation of economies. The paper suggests that policymakers should reflect on resource inequalities when developing measures to support longer working lives for those able to continue, while ensuring alternatives for those facing significant barriers.

Indexed as

CapitalsDigitalisationInequalitiesOlder workersRetirement transitionWelfare regime

Identifiers

PMID42049984
PMCPMC13265443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.