ArticleScientific reports2026
Measurement invariance alignment of the burnout assessment tool (BAT-12) across 29 countries and six continents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the 12-item burnout assessment tool (BAT-12) among 29,433 working adults from 29 countries across six continents. We employed a bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling specification with both fixed and free alignment methods. Across all parameters (loadings and thresholds), 92.62% were invariant. Across the countries, 91.09% of the item intercepts/thresholds and 95.69% of general-factor item loadings were invariant. The specific factor loadings were also highly invariant: mental distance 99.14%, exhaustion 89.94%, emotional impairment 92.53%, and cognitive impairment 91.95%, indicating evidence for the cross-national measurement invariance of the BAT-12. Furthermore, we also illustratively report the means for the cross-country comparisons which showed differences in latent global burnout scores according to this study's samples. The evidence for validity shows that the BAT-12 reliably captures a global burnout dimension from the symptom-factor indicators of its four core symptoms, underscoring the BAT-12's robust psychometric properties across diverse cultural contexts. Practically, the BAT-12 offers a more concise instrument for monitoring burnout complaints in multinational settings, guiding managers, occupational health professionals, and researchers in developing and evaluating burnout prevention and intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.