ArticleScientific reports2026
Federated learning-driven intelligent framework for multi-center radiotherapy dose distribution prediction oriented toward linear accelerators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality radiotherapy dose distribution prediction for linear accelerators remains a labor-intensive process constrained by inter-planner variability and institutional data silos. While deep learning has shown promise in automating dose distribution prediction, most existing methods are trained on single-center datasets, limiting their generalizability. Direct multi-center data pooling is hindered by stringent privacy regulations and heterogeneous clinical protocols. This paper proposes a federated learning-driven framework that enables collaborative model training across geographically distributed institutions without exchanging raw patient data. The framework comprises a multi-scale attention U-Net for three-dimensional dose prediction and an adaptive weighted federated aggregation strategy that dynamically balances data volume and local model quality to address non-independent and non-identically distributed data challenges. A layered privacy protection mechanism integrating gradient-clipped differential privacy with secure aggregation provides privacy-enhancing protections with quantifiable bounds during parameter exchange. Experiments conducted across four clinical centers on head-and-neck and abdominal IMRT cases demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves a mean Gamma pass rate of 96.8%, closely approaching the centralized training upper bound of 97.5% while significantly outperforming single-center models and standard federated averaging. Ablation studies confirm the individual contributions of adaptive weighting and dual attention modules, and robustness analyses validate fault tolerance under client dropout and adversarial conditions. The proposed framework offers a practical and privacy-preserving pathway for breaking data silos in AI-driven radiotherapy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.