Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049924›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Design of an integrated evidence-driven few-shot meta-learning for zero-day malware detection and forensic attributions.

Rijvan Beg, Nikhil Nigam, Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Amit Patel, Surendra Solanki, Sukhwinder Sharma, Lalit Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rijvan BegSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM University - AP, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India, 522240.
Nikhil NigamSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM University - AP, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India, 522240.
Yogesh Kumar SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (MANIT), Bhopal, 462003, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Amit PatelDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (MANIT), Bhopal, 462003, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Surendra SolankiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, Rajasthan, India. Surendra.solanki@jaipur.manipal.edu.
Sukhwinder SharmaDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, Rajasthan, India.
Lalit KumarDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, Rajasthan, India. lalit.kumar@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zero-day malware still slips past the best detection systems because most models need thousands of labeled examples before they learn anything useful. That dependency is exactly the weak point: by the time enough samples accumulate, the damage is already spreading. Traditional few-shot approaches promise quicker adaptation, yet they often reduce rich forensic evidence into flat feature vectors and end up overfitting to byte-level quirks rather than behavioral signals. This work takes a different path and develops a systematic pipeline that treats malware traces as structured evidence, feeding them through a sequence of five meta-learning extensions designed to survive the scarcity of zero-day samples. We begin with EpiForge, which fabricates realistic few-shot episodes from evidence-graphs and injects controlled novelties without breaking causal consistency, ensuring the training tasks resemble true zero-day strangeness. These episodes drive BayesMAML-E, a hierarchical Bayesian meta-learner that encodes evidence-type priors, producing task-conditioned initializations and calibrated uncertainty estimates. The output then flows into CoShaRE, which sparsifies decisions by learning counterfactual Shapley-regularized masks retaining only causally sufficient evidence and generating counter-examples that test decision stability. From there, OptiQuill decides how to spend scarce resources, balancing sandbox runs and labeling efforts using a budget-aware Lagrangian bandit that targets maximum downstream meta-learning gains. Finally, CausalFADE distills the learned behavior into compact automata and executable rules, turning black-box predictions into forensic signatures that analysts can trust and re-use for the process. Across all five stages, we see evidence of measurable impact: 5-shot accuracy improves by more than 10% points over standard MAML, calibration error falls to near 2%, and label and compute budgets are cut substantially. The result is not just faster adaptation but also auditable, causally grounded signatures that close the loop between evidence collection, learning, and deployment. This work appears to offer a path toward zero-day detection that is both technically feasible and operationally sustainable in process.

Indexed as

Bayesian meta-learningCausal attributionEvidence-graphsFew-shot meta-learningScenariosZero-day malware

Identifiers

PMID42049924
PMCPMC13338176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.