Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049919›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Unified time series classification framework for explainable artificial intelligence.

Hendrio Bragança, Eduardo Souto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hendrio BragançaInstitute of Computing, Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, AM, Brazil. hendrio.luis@icomp.ufam.edu.br.
Eduardo SoutoInstitute of Computing, Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, AM, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing complexity of machine learning (ML) models has made their decision-making processes increasingly opaque, posing a critical challenge in high-stakes domains where trust, transparency, and accountability are essential. While Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques attempt to mitigate this issue, most existing approaches exhibit important limitations when applied to time series data due to its inherently sequential, dynamic, and context-dependent structure. In this work, we introduce the Unified Time Series Classification Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (UTS-XAI), which integrates a standard classification pipeline with comprehensive, time-aware XAI evaluation metrics, such as faithfulness, robustness, sensitivity, stability, and localization. The framework supports multiple explanation methods, such as SHAP, LIME, and Saliency Maps, and enables their systematic comparison using adapted versions of widely used XAI metrics (faithfulness, robustness, sensitivity, and stability) reinterpreted for temporal data. We further propose Global Interpretable Clustering (GIC), a visualization technique designed to evaluate the consistency of feature attributions across different explainers and model architectures. Experiments on the MIT-BIH, SVDB, and INCART datasets show that DeepConvLSTM achieved robust baseline performance, maintaining an F1-score of 93.5% on the external INCART test set. Our quantitative analysis reveals that globally consistent methods such as SHAP significantly outperform localized techniques such as LIME and Saliency Maps. SHAP exhibits extreme faithfulness; ablating its top 10% of identified features collapses models' true positive detection rates from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, SHAP yields highly stable explanations across diverse deep architectures (median Dynamic Time Warping distance  1.5) and maintains superior structural robustness under noise (SSIM  0.95). Overall, our findings demonstrate that accuracy alone is insufficient in time series modeling without robust and reliable interpretability. By embedding explainability throughout the entire model development lifecycle, UTS-XAI establishes a unified foundation for interpretable, transparent, and trustworthy AI in temporal data analysis.

Indexed as

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)Explainable time seriesHealthcareSignal processingTime series classification

Identifiers

PMID42049919
PMCPMC13369486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.