Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049907›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

High-temperature and high-salinity performance of chelating agents for oilfield scale inhibition with dynamic scale loop.

Ose Budiman, Shabeeb Alajmei, Murtada Saleh Aljawad, Mohamed Mahmoud, Muhammad Shahzad Kamal, Mobeen Murtaza, Prasad Karadkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ose BudimanDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), 31261, Dhahran, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3487-2903
Shabeeb AlajmeiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), 31261, Dhahran, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. alajmisn@kfupm.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5816-4214
Murtada Saleh AljawadDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), 31261, Dhahran, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3540-6807
Mohamed MahmoudDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), 31261, Dhahran, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4395-9567
Muhammad Shahzad KamalCenter for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, 31261, Dhahran, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2359-836X
Mobeen MurtazaCenter for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, 31261, Dhahran, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-4665
Prasad KaradkarProduction Technology Division, EXPEC Advanced Research Center, Saudi Aramco, 31311, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-9749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scale formation in oil and gas operations reduces production efficiency and increases costs, especially in high-salinity and high-temperature environments. Conventional inhibitors often fail in such harsh conditions. This study examines diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and glutamic acid diacetic acid (GLDA) as primary scale inhibitors under dynamic flow conditions. The experiments use a dynamic scale loop (DSL) that mimics reservoir conditions, with a commercial phosphonate scale inhibitor acting as a comparison benchmark. Experiments were performed at temperatures of 200 °F, 275 °F, and 338 °F, using high salinity water (TDS of 58,500 ppm) representing seawater and formation water (TDS of 274,740 ppm) at mixing ratios of 50:50 and 80:20, with injection rates of 1 and 10 cc/min, and inhibitor concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 wt%. Scale formation was strongly accelerated by increasing temperature, flow rate, and ion interaction in the 50:50 brine mixture. All inhibitors delayed scale formation relative to the uninhibited case; however, performance varied significantly with operating conditions. Inhibitor effectiveness was evaluated using a normalized improvement factor relative to prescale conditions. DTPA demonstrated strong performance at elevated temperatures, while GLDA showed more consistent performance at higher flow rates. The phosphonate inhibitor performed well under moderate conditions but showed reduced effectiveness under more severe HTHS conditions. Notably, GLDA at 338 °F, with a 50:50 brine mixture and a flow rate of 10 cc/min, delayed scale formation by 11-fold, the most significant improvement observed. These findings demonstrate that inhibitor performance is governed by both thermodynamic stability and kinetic effects and highlight the importance of condition-specific inhibitor selection. Overall, this study provides a systematic framework for evaluating scale inhibitors under realistic dynamic HTHS conditions and demonstrates the potential of chelating agents as effective alternatives for challenging environments.

Indexed as

Chelating agentDynamic scale loopHigh-temperature and high-salinityOilfield scaleSeawater

Identifiers

PMID42049907
PMCPMC13316054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.