Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049899›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A case study to compare the methods of SOC estimation for lithium-ion batteries using second-order RC circuit model.

H Y Xu, J L Wang, W W Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H Y XuSchool of information and communication engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, 570204, China.
J L WangHainan Aoke Chemical Co., Ltd, Danzhou, 571700, China. wangjunlong@oxiranchem.com.
W W WangHainan Institute of Industry, Haikou, 570204, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate modeling and state-of-charge (SOC) estimation of power batteries are key issues in battery management systems (BMSs). In this study, a 24 Ah lithium-ion power battery is taken as the research object. Based on HPPC test data and constant-current discharge data, a second-order RC equivalent circuit model is established, and the performance of three parameter identification methods (RLS, FFRLS, and VFFRLS) as well as two state estimation algorithms (EKF and UKF) for SOC estimation is systematically compared.The results show that all three algorithms can achieve online parameter identification, among which VFFRLS improves parameter convergence speed and identification accuracy through a dynamically adjusted forgetting factor. For SOC estimation, the EKF maintains terminal voltage errors within 80 mV, and the SOC estimation error converges after approximately 1700 s, with an RMSE of 8.93%. In contrast, the UKF exhibits better performance, with terminal voltage errors mainly within 20 mV (maximum below 50 mV) and SOC estimation errors within 2%. Overall, the VFFRLS–UKF combination demonstrates the best SOC estimation performance under dynamic operating conditions.The results provide a reference for the selection and optimization of online SOC estimation methods in practical BMS applications.

Indexed as

Electric vehicleEquivalent circuit modelParameter identificationState of charge

Identifiers

PMID42049899
PMCPMC13287774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.