ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a new perspective on risk factors and clinical prediction models.
Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a prevalent and serious comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), significantly increasing the fracture burden. Although early detection is crucial, OP screening in RA is often delayed, representing an unmet clinical need. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) offer a solution for early risk stratification, yet a synthesis that integrates RA-OP risk factors and evaluates existing CPMs is lacking. This review addresses this gap by delineating the multidimensional risk network for RA-OP and evaluating the development, performance, and applicability of current CPMs. We find that despite evolution from basic to sophisticated biomarker-integrated algorithms, most CPMs are constrained by modest sample sizes, insufficient external validation, and suboptimal clinical translatability. The current paradigm focuses predominantly on diagnosis rather than prognosis. To address these limitations, future research should aim to enhance the methodological rigor and generalizability of models, expand their predictive scope to encompass future risk of OP and fractures, and develop RA-specific fracture prediction tools that incorporate disease-specific pathophysiology, with performance rigorously benchmarked against established tools such as the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Progress along these lines may help shift the management paradigm toward more proactive and personalized prevention, with the potential to improve long-term skeletal health outcomes in RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42049891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.